The Problem with Independent Historians

April 8, 2024

In most cases, we know who independent historians are: mothers, fathers, guardians, grandparents, or adult children. But we still see many instances when the term is incorrectly applied in the documentation—mostly, it seems, because of misunderstandings about when someone providing information qualifies as an independent historian.

In clearing up the confusion, let’s go back to the definition: The American Medical Association (AMA) defines an independent historian as “an individual (e.g., parent, guardian, surrogate, spouse, witness) who provides a history in addition to the history provided by the patient who is unable to provide a complete or reliable history (e.g., due to developmental stage, dementia, or psychosis) or because a confirmatory history is judged to be necessary.”1 In essence, the independent historian assists in gathering relevant historical information when the patient’s own account is insufficient or unreliable. Their role is crucial in ensuring accurate medical assessments and decision-making.

The problems often arise over the phrases “in addition to the history provided by the patient” and “relevant historical information.” For example, we see documentation of many encounters where a spouse or parent is counted as an independent history for providing additional information even though the patient could verify information on their own.

Here’s a specific illustration. A patient’s wife accompanies her husband to the encounter and contributes additional information, such as noting that he isn’t sleeping well at night or that she has advised him to drink cranberry juice because he isn’t urinating well. In such a case, the spouse is not serving as an independent history because her husband can provide that information for himself. The spouse’s added details may be relevant but should be considered as contributing information, not an independent history.2

We also see a number of questions about validating an independent historian for pediatric or geriatric patients. Are there age limits? Shouldn’t we validate for everyone?

12023 CPT E/M descriptors and guidelines (ama-assn.org), p. 17

2National Alliance of Medical Auditing Specialists, Independent Historian – NAMAS

Remember, you’ll need three components for complete documentation of an independent historian:

(1) First, document that a historian was involved;
(2) Document the reason why an independent historian was needed (that is, why the patient could not provide “a complete or reliable history” for themselves; and
(3) If other sources provided pertinent information (such as a home aid, group home attendant, teacher, police officer, or social worker), specifically document each of these.

Given all of these possible sources of information, it makes sense to create a template that you can use for these scenarios, such as:

The patient was seen at _______ years/months old, in conjunction with ____________(role of the person who accompanied the patient to the encounter), and based on the developmental age of the patient, the _____________ (person serving as the historian) reports that _______________________. The patient was unable to furnish a complete or reliable history because ______________________________________________ (information on the patient’s limiting conditions, such as dementia, psychosis, or stroke with aphasia).3

The provider can easily complete the information in this template and fulfill the requirements for an independent historian. Alternatively, the provider can simply incorporate this information into the documentation as the exam continues. Use whichever approach is easier for accurately documenting the information.

Remember: To receive proper credit for the independent historian, include the proper documentation, the reason why the historian was needed, and the person(s) supplying the “history.” While it can be helpful for a wife or child to bring up issues on behalf of their spouse or parent, this information cannot be credited towards the MDM (medical decision-making) if the patient can speak for himself as a competent historian.

3Independent Historian – NAMAS

Got a question about E/M coding? We’d love to hear from you.

Submit your questions by emailing us at coders@calmwatersai.com

 

Download PDF

Michelle Sergei-Casiano
Michelle Sergei-Casiano
Michelle Sergei-Casiano
CPC, CFPC, CEMC, CPMA Senior Manager, Regulatory and Coding Compliance coders@calmwatersai.com

 

More Coffee & Coding

What, precisely, is a “self-limited” condition?

What, precisely, is a “self-limited” condition? May 6, 2024 This issue is a continuing source of uncertainty for coders and providers alike, especially since we all analyze and apply information differently in medical decision making (MDM). So, how can we bring...

More E/M Coding Questions (and Answers!)

More E/M Coding Questions (and Answers!) April 29, 2024 This week, we pick up where we left off with the last issue of Coffee & Coding, when we addressed questions about how tests and lab work can count toward complexity of data in medical decision-making (MDM).1...

When Can the Amount and Complexity of Data Apply to Lab Tests?

When Can the Amount and Complexity of Data Apply to Lab Tests? April 22, 2024 It’s a great question—and one that generates discussions in almost every medical office. In this issue (and next week’s, too), we’ll examine some scenarios that will help you clarify the...

More Pro Tips & Tricks

More Pro Tips & Tricks April 15, 2024 Back by popular demand: We received such a positive response to our “tips and tricks” edition of Coffee & Coding that we’ve decided to make it a recurring feature each quarter. So, we invite you to grab a fresh cup of...

Making Complexity of Problems a Little Less Complex

Making Complexity of Problems a Little Less Complex April 1, 2024 We see a lot of questions (and confusion) over what constitutes an “acute illness with systemic symptoms.” In fact, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics, “Of the three elements that make up...

Making the Right Choice Between Level 3 and Level 4: Part Two

Making the Right Choice Between Level 3 and Level 4: Part Two March 25, 2024 In last week’s Coffee & Coding, we provided a refresher on key points to remember about coding appropriately for Level 3. This week let’s do the same for Level 4. Level 4 can be a little...

Level 3 or Level 4: Getting It Right

Level 3 or Level 4: Getting It Right March 18, 2024 Guidelines notwithstanding, deciding whether to apply Level 3 or Level 4 to a patient encounter isn’t always easy. In fact, we see a lot of inconsistency and confusion on this point. While many clinicians accurately...

Ending Confusion over Modifier 25

Ending Confusion over Modifier 25 March 11, 2024 It’s a big week here in Boston (my hometown). Sunday, of course, is St. Patrick’s Day. Here in Boston, we also remember March 17 as Evacuation Day—marking the anniversary of the British army leaving the city in 1776....

MDM Level 5: A Quick Refresher on a Complex Subject

MDM Level 5: A Quick Refresher on a Complex Subject March 4, 2024 We continue to see that, across all medical specialties, physicians are still nervous about billing for Level 5 office visits. I consistently find that many (if not most) providers code for Level 4 even...

HIPAA Compliance: Make sure you know ALL the rules

HIPAA Compliance: Make sure you know ALL the rules February 26, 2024 The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 is a federal law restricting access to individuals' private medical information. That much, I’m sure, our readers already knew....

Making sense of the new coding-by-time rules for 2024

Making sense of the new coding-by-time rules for 2024 February 19, 2024 We all know that the new year brings changes (some years, more than others). As it turns out, no sooner had we gotten clinicians on track with how much time belongs to the E/M CPT code set than...

How do you code a broken heart?

How do you code a broken heart? Plus: We answer your questions about toxicity monitoring. February 12, 2024 First things first: While remembering to apply the proper codes and include sufficient documentation, providers and coders must not lose sight of one essential...

Documentation Tips and Tricks: How to Avoid Common Mistakes

Documentation Tips and Tricks: How to Avoid Common Mistakes February 5, 2024 Every day we see coding mistakes that affect the accuracy of E/M coding levels. Some of them can be costly. So, in this issue of Coffee & Coding, we’ll look more closely at some of these...

Toxic diagnosis coding: What you may be missing

Toxic diagnosis coding: What you may be missing January 29, 2024 Three quick questions: When did you last look in that little section towards the back of your ICD-10 coding book called the Drug Table? How often have you coded an adverse reaction to a bug bite as...

Why and how to use the new SDOH codes

Why and how to use the new SDOH codes January 22, 2024 Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) have become increasingly important in determining the needs of patients and directing them to the help they need. For 2024, we have both a new diagnosis code as well as a new...

Subscribe to Our Weekly Coffee & Coding Newsletter